Question: I am the Executive Director of a 75 attorney firm in Miami. We are meeting in a few months to revise our strategic plan. Some of our partners have suggested that as a result of the current business and economic climate that we start with a clean sheet of paper. Where should we start? What do you see as the key questions that we should be addressing?
Response:
Strategic planning is essentially a five step process. The first step begins be asking questions. Start by asking the following questions:
So take your time – remember strategic planning is a process – not a one-time event. The process is as important as the final plan itself. Don't try to get it done in a day or over a weekend. Rome was not built in a day.
Click here for our blog on law firm strategy
Click here for articles on other topics
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
I am a partner in a five attorney PI plaintiff law firm in Central Kentucky. We have three partners and two associates in the firm. We are first generation. Our practice is focused 100% on PI plaintiff cases. While we focus on all types and sizes of PI cases we are not a high volume advertising PI practice. Our practice has been built upon our successes and referrals from past clients and other lawyers. We have never done much in the way of other forms of marketing and advertising other than a small yellow page ad and a Martindale Hubbell listing. We are finding it harder to obtain a sufficient quantity of quality cases as a result of increased competition from the advertising PI firms, statutory changes, tight fisted insurance company claim managers, etc. We believe that we may need to being doing more to market our practice. What are your suggestions?
Response:
We are hearing similiar stories from our PI plaintiff law firm clients across the U.S. Case counts are down, quality of cases are not what they used to be, competition is fierce, and cases are getting harder to settle. The strategy is different from a firm that wants to build a high volume practice (build a factory) from a firm that desires to build a reputation-based practice. In essence you need to determine whether you want to build a high volume practice (a factory) or continue with a high quality reputation-based practice. Assuming that you want to continue your reputation-based practice here are a few suggestions:
– Adequate budget
– First Rate Web Site
– Appropriate directory listings
– Inside Marketing Coordinator
– Relationship Management Database
– Capability Materials
– E-News Letters via Service
– Articles
– Testimonials
– Public Relations
– Accountability by all attorneys and staff
4. Develop a program for increasing the firm’s exposure to the newer younger generation non-PI and solo attorneys and small firms.
5. Provide excellent client service
6. Keep your yellow page ad for now but reduce investment
7. Understand the power of PR in Trial Strategy.
8. Develop a formal lead tracking process and invest in resources
9. Organize to maximize contact with potential clients.
Click here for our blog on marketing
Click here for our published articles
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
I am a partner in an 8 attorney firm in the Chicago suburbs. Our firm has started having discussions about what we need to be doing differently. This is huge for us – one meeting a year is our typical meeting frequency and then only to discuss how we are going to cut the pie. How have other firms done during the recession? What are you seeing?
Response:
In general small firms in the midwest have fared pretty well during the recession. Last year some firms had the best year ever while others experienced flat or 10% revenue declines. Small firms that had the biggest problems were those that had issues before the recession or were in problem practice areas. Big law firms have had to face unique challenges.
Small firms that have weathered the storm and fared the best were those that:
I believe that law firms that fail to focus their practices, set goals, measure accomplishments, and foster accountability will fall short and not meet their financial objectives. Law firms that fail to plan are planning to fail.
Law firms as well as solo practices need to begin focusing their firms and practices, setting firm and individual production goals, measure accomplishment and implementing systems to instill accountability from all members of the team – attorneys and staff alike.
Consider using budgeting which is a tool that can be used to measure goal attainment and how well the firm is doing.
What gets measured is what gets done.
Click here for our blog on law firm strategy
Click here for my article on creating strategic (business) plans.
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
I am a partner with an 8 attorney firm in central Illinois. Last week I attended the Illinois State Bar Association web-cast that you and others presented on Building and Managing the Virtual Law Firm. I thought the program was excellent. I do have a couple of questions.
Response:
If your firm has a sufficient volume of work, does not have a need or desire to capture more commodity type legal work that it is either not doing at all now or is losing to lower priced competitors (law firms or content providers), or does not have a need or desire to extend its reach geographically a virtual delivery model make not make sense. However, if your strategic (business plan) requires you to extend your geographic reach or be competitive in a commodity practice area supplementing your brick and mortar practice with a virtual delivery model might warrant consideration. Also consider that the younger generation that is growing up using the internet to shop, bank, and pay taxes may appreciate and or expect such an option. As we mentioned during the session certain practice areas are more appropriate than others. I have some firms your size that are supplementing their brick and mortar practices with on-line delivery models just to service one practice area that they could not effectively deliver in the traditional manner. Keep in mind the value curve that we discussed during the session.
During the session I illustrated a continuum and we discussed the difference between virtual practices (doing virtual things) and a total on-line virtual practice. Even if you decide that the firm is not ready for a total on-line virtual practice, you may want to consider doing some of the virtual practices (virtual things) that we discussed to offer your clients more delivery options and more flexibility to your attorneys and staff.
Start with your strategic plan and if you don’t have one begin developing your long range plan. If you want to move in this direction you can use my handout as a resource guide.
Click here for our blog on law firm strategy
Click here for my article on creating strategic (business) plans.
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
I am a legal administrator in a 20 attorney firm in southwest Texas. My partners have been expressing concern about loss of several key clients and wants to know what we can do determine why this happened and what we can do to improve client service? I have been thinking about doing a client survey? What are your thoughts?
Response:
Much can be learned by talking to your clients. Structured telephone interviews and other forms of surveys conducted by a neutral third party can provide many surprises as well as answers. Client satisfaction surveys can be the best marketing investment that you can make. Our law firm clients have found their clients to be impressed that the firm cares about their opinions. It is good business to listen to your clients. Understanding what bugs people about your services and those of your competition can be the most valuable input to strategy development you can get your hands on. Find out what bugs your clients and you will learn to out-think and out-service your competitors.
Before you invest any time, money, or effort in developing an overall strategy for service improvement, you must survey your clients to understand what your clients want and expect from your firm. An initial survey helps you identify the starting point for your service improvement journey.
Planning The Survey
The type of survey that your firm chooses depends on your purpose for doing the survey. Are you looking for some insight into why you’ve lost clients? Are you interested in getting a general idea of how your clients feel about your firm? Following are some of the basic types of surveys that you may want to consider:
Random Client Survey or Census
These surveys are used to measure overall client satisfaction and highlight any widespread service problems and identify new business opportunities. A random survey involves selecting a percentage of your clients (sample), contacting them by phone, mail or in person (or a combination of all three), and asking them to evaluate the services they receive from your firm. A census involves surveying all clients rather than taking a sample.
Lost Client Survey
This type of survey is used if your firm wants to know why you have lost a particular client or group of clients. With this survey interviews are conducted (usually by telephone or in person) with clients that no longer do business with your firm. Let the client know that you are sorry that he or she is no longer doing business with your firm and that you are interested in learning from your mistakes. Understanding your client’s reason for leaving will help you make improvements for future clients. One of the greatest benefits for this type of survey is that you are often able to discover the specific reason a client left.
Key Client Survey
Rather than doing a random survey of your client base, you may want a more targeted and focused survey of a particular client group. For example, if 80 to 90 percent of your business comes from ten clients, you may want to create a survey that is specifically targeted to them. The advantage of a targeted key client survey is that it is limited in scope and precisely focused. Before you commit time and resources to a client survey identify your purpose and establish specific goals and objectives.
Develop a survey plan. Insure that a follow-up strategy is incorporated into the plan.
Click here for our blog on client service
Click here for our article on the topic
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
Our firm is in its second generation. While we are proud that we have been in business for over 60 years we also believe we need to re-examine our practice and embrace changes that may be needed for the firm to move forward and remain competitive. We are a 16 attorney firm located in Wisconsin. We have 12 partners and four associates.
Response:
More and more law firms are re-examining their business models and approaches and running the practice as a business. You may want to begin by conducting a management review or audit to determine where the firm is presently and where the firm needs to head in the future.
Start by Asking the Following Questions:
I suggest that you conduct a practice management review that will provide you with a clear assessment of the firm’s practices and performance and outline a plan for implementing “Best Practices”. The assessment should focus on:
Click here for our blog on profit improvement and other topics
Click here for articles on other topics
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
Our firm is conducting a planning retreat next month. We have had retreats in past years that have focused on “touchy feely” programs for the attending partners. This year we really want to focus on a strategy and plan for the future. What do you see as primary changes and challenges ahead for law firms and lawyers?
Response:
The internet as well as advances in information technology has and will continue to be the key driver forcing change in the legal marketplace as well as other segments and our daily lives as well. Being the king of the hill or the biggest is not the strategic advantage that it once was. The internet is leveling the playing field in many industries as well as law firms. There are new opportunities and new competitors. Consider the following:
Challenges and Questions to Think About
Click here for our blog on strategies
Click here for articles on other topics
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
Our firm, a 12 attorney firm, in Detroit, is having a partner meeting next week focused on thinking about what we can do different in 2011 in order to have a more successful year. While we have a few ideas what are your thoughts?
Response:
The economy is still posing challenges for many law firms and will continue to do so in 2011. Law firms must continue to be dilligent about managing costs but more importantly must really hone in on improving revenues. Here are a few ideas:
Click here for articles on other topics
Click here for our archive blog on strategies
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
I am the managing partner of a 90 attorney firm in Chicago. We have 45 equity partners, 20 non-equity partners, and 25 associates. We have a three member executive committee as well as other committees in place in addition to the managing partner. Five years ago we formulated a strategic plan and have been attempting to successfully implement it since that time. We have had limited success. We don't seem to be able to get our partners "on board" with the actual implementation. I will tell you – I am truly herding cats here. Any ideas on how to get these guys and gals on board?
Response:
Getting your partners on board is always a challenge. The obstacles are almost too numerous to outline. Yet if law firms want to be successful in this turbulent environment they must embrace change and get their partners not only behind new strategies but often they must also be the ones to implement these strategies as well.
Managing lawyers in general is like herding cats. But trying to manage "star partners" is a real challenge. They are the "hitters" upon which a firm's future often depends. True star partners are:
Star and other partners in the firm must continually balance their roles as producer, manager, and owner. Often, these roles may be in conflict. Also there are personal strategies and agendas as well.
Actually, I don't think they can be managed – but they can be led. There is a difference. But in order to accomplish this the following need to be well designed, in alignment and balanced:
Strategy
The personalities, emotions and needs of your partners constrain a firm's ability to design and implement strategy. Keep in mind that firm leadership cannot order the troops forward; instead the troops (partners) must essentially vote with their feet to pursue a new strategic direction. Absent a crisis, partners tend to stay on track and support only modest adjustments to strategy.
Organizational (Structure, Governance, HR Systems)
When organizational characteristics – structure, governance, and HR systems (recruiting, training and mentoring, performance management, and compensation) are aligned with the needs of the partners and the strategy of the firm, they create the conditions under which strategy can be implemented effectively. Matrix and team structures are the norm. Collegial partnerships, consensus based governance, and leadership at the pleasure of the partners, rules the day. The cats have the power and the leader serves to a large extent at their pleasure.
Culture
The firm's culture deals with its underlying core of beliefs and values, which shape the behavior of the firm. Nothing can weave new strategic and organization choices together and hold them in alignment better than culture. A strong culture can also provide enormous help in attracting, retaining and motivating stars. A strong culture is the glue that helps a firm overcome major obstacles, it can help foster major changes in strategy and or organization, and it can be a strong force for unity and coherence.
Leadership
As the firm's leaders you and the other leaders in the firm are serving at the pleasure of your partners. You are probably elected by them. Your positional power is limited – sort of like the President of the United States and the Congress. As a result exceptional leadership skills are needed and each of you must master the skills of building consensus and facilitating decisions so your partners will agree with and support them.
For a good read on this subject – the book “Aligning the Stars” by Jay W. Lorsch and Thomas Tierney is an excellent resource.
Good luck!
Click here for articles on other topics
Click here for our blog postings on partnership and governance
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC
Question:
Our firm is a 25 attorney IP law firm located in Washington D.C. Metro area. We are planning our year end firm retreat to plan for next year. This will be our third retreat. While we believe we have achieved some positive results from the last three retreats – we believe that we need to accomplish much more. What are your ideas or thoughts on the matter?
Response:
We find that many law firms try to use their retreats to be an extended version of their regular partnership meetings. They simply try to do too much. The agendas are loaded down with far too many topics. As a result there is a lot of debate and discussion on often day-to-day operational items and no focus on the more complex-strategic issues that often have been ignored or pushed under the rug.
This year try to do less and achieve more! Consider narrowing down the topic agenda and focusing on one of the following areas of concentration:
Concentrate on an area and come out of your retreat with specific action plans which can be implemented and put in place.
John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC